Sunday, September 26, 2010

A New Pedagogy?

I do believe that a new pedagogy is trying to emerge due to the advances in technology, but as discussed in Richardson's blog, Weblogg-ed, it faces multiple roadblocks. Teachers have the potential to be strong champions of this new pedagogy or we can be its greatest detractors. Our interactions with our students, positive or negative, have the potential to affect lives because our students pay attention to what we do (even more than to what we say!). To teach is to model, and if you don't think that students aren't watching what you do and say, just come to class one day with a different haircut or attire!
Richardson believes that teachers themselves need to redefine the way we learn so that we can then model this skill for our students. He makes the point that we need to teach our students how to be more self-directed learners, that this is "THE 21st Century Skill", and to be able to teach them this skill, we ourselves must be able to learn new skills on our own or with other learners. (see "A Shifting Notion of What It Means to Teach). However, because many teachers are a product of the way they themselves were taught, many teachers do not want to teach these 21st Century skills. There is a feeling that if the way we learned was good enough for us, it should be good enough for the new generation.

We live in a world where change is taking place at an incredible pace. To be able to use the available tools to learn and adapt to this change is a critical skill which our students will be able to use "in the real world". As teachers, though, we encounter hurdles to embracing the new pedagogy. We must fulfill state standards and make sure that our students pass their standardized tests. There is talk of making a percentage of each teacher's pay be determined by the success rates of his/her students in passing these tests. These tests do not assess "self directed learning". Increasing work duties, decreasing pay (which can mean the addition of part time jobs to supplement income), and the tenuousness of job security can put demands on a teacher's learning time (which for most must be "extracurricular"). Growing class sizes, decreasing budgets, lack of administrative support and changes in education laws mean that the teacher who wants to learn and teach 21st century skills must be self-motivated and creative in finding ways to achieve the goal. This is where I can see that joining a learning community can motivate, support and inspire a teacher in his/her quest to be a participant in this new era of education!

4 comments:

  1. I hope teaching doesn't start paying by the grade, though in ways it already does.
    If the students learn through self-directed ways this can show itself in the test results as well.
    BTW, I love the look of your blog.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great post! I agree that we teach through model, which is why our creativity will teach our students how to think outside the box. It is hard to meet not only the state standards but we must explain to state minded parents how an online or computer assignment meets expectations I mean standards. :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think that the computer is a great way to engage students so that they can accomplish the state standards. The more I experience the web the more I see that it can be the vehicle for teaching the standards. What a fabulous way to differentiate curriculum and promote self directed learning.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Gail, I agree that the computer can engage students to accomplish the state standards. My school uses computer driven instruction because we are "open entry". My job is more that of tutor as I do a lot of teaching one on one or in small groups. This class however is giving me great ideas on how to incorporate other technology tools to enhance the instruction the students already receive.

    ReplyDelete